Domain-Grounded Formula Recommendation for Catalyst Composition Design

Keywords

artificial intelligence
health

Abstract

This review examines domain-grounded formula recommendation for catalyst composition design through a mechanism-to-decision framework. It asks which retrieval and graph signals should govern composition suggestions. Evidence is organized around representation, validation, uncertainty, and operational control, with no invented experiments or unreported quantitative results. Particular attention is given to domain adaptation reproducing formula frequency instead of mechanism. The synthesis shows that credible translation depends on explicit system boundaries, source-level traceability, failure-aware evaluation, and revalidation triggers. These principles provide a disciplined basis for composition and formulation support while keeping component promise distinct from system readiness.

References

Debe, M. K. (2012). Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature, 486, 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11115

Du, C., & Jin, K. (2025). Multi-object grounding via hierarchical contrastive Siamese transformers. In 2025 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN64981.2025.11228633

Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

Li, X., He, H., Lu, G., Yue, P., Chen, J., Yang, Z., & Hon, C. (2025). TCM-DS: A large language model for intelligent traditional Chinese medicine edible herbal formulas recommendations. Chinese Medicine, 20, 191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-025-01249-0

Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.

Norskov, J. K., Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A., Lindqvist, L., Kitchin, J. R., Bligaard, T., & Jonsson, H. (2004). Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 108(46), 17886-17892. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp047349j

Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1135-1144). https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.

Xia, F., Li, B., An, B., Zachman, M. J., Xie, X., Liu, Y., Xu, S., Saha, S., Wu, Q., Gao, S., Abdul Razak, I. B., Brown, D. E., Ramani, V., Wang, R., Marks, T. J., Shao, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2024). Cooperative atomically dispersed Fe-N4 and Sn-Nx moieties for durable and more active oxygen electroreduction in fuel cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 146(49), 33569-33578. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c11121