Uncertainty Quantification and Risk-Aware Stock Prediction: A Bayesian Graph-Based State Space Approach

Keywords

Uncertainty Quantification

Abstract

Stock market prediction inherently involves significant uncertainty arising from the stochastic nature of market dynamics, incomplete information, and the complex interdependencies among financial variables. While the Stock State Space Graph (S3G) model has demonstrated superior predictive accuracy by integrating state space modeling with graph-based relational reasoning, it provides only point predictions without quantifying the uncertainty associated with these predictions. This limitation is critical in financial applications where risk management and decision-making under uncertainty are paramount. This paper proposes a novel framework, Uncertainty-Aware Stock State Space Graph (UA-S3G), that extends the S3G architecture through Bayesian uncertainty quantification. Our approach distinguishes between epistemic uncertainty (model uncertainty arising from insufficient training data) and aleatoric uncertainty (inherent data noise) by employing variational inference and Monte Carlo dropout techniques. We adapt explanation-based bias decoupling regularization principles from Zang and Liu's work on natural language inference to improve uncertainty calibration in the presence of spurious correlations. Through extensive experiments on benchmark financial datasets, we demonstrate that UA-S3G produces well-calibrated prediction intervals and substantially outperforms baseline methods in risk-aware trading scenarios. Our work contributes to the growing body of research on trustworthy AI in finance, providing principled uncertainty estimates that enable more robust and reliable stock prediction systems.

References

1. Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2016). Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (pp. 1050-1059). PMLR.

2. Zang, J., & Liu, H. (2024, June). Explanation based bias decoupling regularization for natural language inference. In 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.

3. Kendall, A., & Gal, Y. (2017). What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NeurIPS) (pp. 5574-5584). Curran Associates.

4. Lu, Y., Hu, K., & Zhang, L. (2026, May). S3G: Stock State Space Graph for Enhanced Stock Trend Prediction. In ICASSP 2026-2026 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 4081-4085). IEEE.

5. Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A., & Blundell, C. (2017). Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NeurIPS) (pp. 6402-6413). Curran Associates.

6. Sensoy, M., Kaplan, L., & Kandemir, M. (2018). Evidential deep learning to quantify classification uncertainty. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (NeurIPS) (pp. 3179-3189). Curran Associates.

7. Blundell, C., Cornebise, J., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Wierstra, D. (2015). Weight uncertainty in neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (pp. 1613-1622). PMLR.

8. Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2020). Graph neural networks: A survey of methods and applications. AI Open, 1, 57-81.

9. Madigan, D., & Raftery, A. E. (1991). Model selection and accounting for model uncertainty in graphical models using Occam's window. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(428), 1535-1546.

10. Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2004). Honey, I shrunk the sample covariance matrix. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(4), 110-119.

11. Nixon, J., Dusenberry, M. W., Jerfel, G., Nguyen, T., & Tran, B. A. (2019). Measuring calibration in deep learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (pp. 38-41). IEEE.

12. Bei, J., Liu, Z., Huang, J., Wang, X., & Yang, P. (2025, December). Strategic Human Resource Analytics with Explainable Artificial Intelligence: An Interpretable Prediction Framework for Employee Promotion to Support Managerial Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the 2025 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Management Technology (pp. 77-82).

13. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.

14. Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2, 21-42.

15. Jiang, A., Huang, J., & Yun, X. (2026, March). Design and empirical research of simulation algorithms for business decision support with BERT and ISAC integration. In International Conference on Cloud Computing, Performance Computing, and Deep Learning (CCPCDL 2025) (Vol. 14131, pp. 331-336). SPIE.

16. Bao, W., Xu, K., & Leng, Q. (2024). Research on the Financial Credit Risk Management Model of Real Estate Supply Chain Based on GA-SVM Algorithm: A Comprehensive Evaluation of AI Model and Traditional Model. Procedia Computer Science, 243, 900-909.