Accounting Supervision as a Model for Auditable Intelligent Oversight
PDF

Keywords

accounting supervision
insider trading
auditability

Abstract

This internal reference article examines auditable oversight across accounting and intelligent systems through a design-and-assurance lens. It synthesizes the allocated target literature without reporting new experiments, observations, or performance estimates. The analysis treats the practical unit of review as a monitored action, detection process, supervisory intervention, record, and contestation path. That framing keeps technical mechanisms, evidence quality, user consequences, and institutional controls visible in the same argument. Particular attention is given to how oversight can change behavior while remaining reviewable. The review distinguishes what each cited source directly addresses from the cross-domain principles used for internal comparison. It argues that credible adoption depends on traceable requirements, context-sensitive evaluation, explicit uncertainty, and a documented path for human intervention. The result is a structured reference for teams considering market compliance and AI-enabled monitoring, especially where false assurance, selective enforcement, and privacy leakage could turn a technically plausible component into an unreliable system. The article is intended to support scoping, design review, and evidence planning; it is not a claim of product readiness or an original empirical study.

PDF

References

Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394

Bhattacharya, U., & Daouk, H. (2002). The world price of insider trading. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 75–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00416

Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x

Jackson, H. E., & Roe, M. J. (2009). Public and private enforcement of securities laws: Resource-based evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.08.006

Liu, K., Xiong, H., Zhang, J., & Peng, M. (2026). MOSAIC: A Cognitively Motivated Multi-Agent Framework for Interpretable and Training-Free Empathetic Dialogue. Electronics, 15(10), 2078.

Tao, J., Lyu, R., & Cao, X. (2026). A Deep Learning-Based Automated Content Moderation Framework for Online Platforms. Future-Adaptive Intelligence and Lifelong Systems, 1(1).

Tao, J., Lyu, R., & Cao, X. (2026). A Scalable Data Governance Architecture for Privacy-Aware Intelligent Learning Systems in Lifelong. Future-Adaptive Intelligence and Lifelong Systems, 1(1).

Wang, J., Fan, L., Li, B., & Zhang, L. (2026). Forecasting with Guidance: Representation-Level Supervision for Time Series Forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.24262.

Xiong, H., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Pan, T., & Hu, Q. (2026). VividTalker: A Modular Framework for Expressive 3D Talking Avatars with Controllable Gaze and Blink. In ICASSP 2026 - 2026 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

Zhang, L., & Yong, F. (2026). The impact of government accounting supervision on insider trading in China. Borsa Istanbul Review, 26(1), 1–14. Article 100764.