Uncertainty-Aware Decision Support for Relational Knowledge for Scientific Manufacturing: Lifecycle Evidence and Accountable Decisions
PDF

Keywords

artificial intelligence
materials
systems
evidence synthesis
reliability
provenance

Abstract

Scientific manufacturing decisions increasingly draw on relations extracted from papers, laboratory records, process data, and maintenance narratives, yet an AI system can express uncertain knowledge with misleading precision. This review proposes an uncertainty-aware architecture for relational evidence across the manufacturing lifecycle. Language models identify entities and relation candidates, graph neural networks integrate local structure, and probabilistic layers represent source disagreement, missing context, and distribution shift. Every edge retains a link to its passage, specimen, batch, method, model version, and validation status; generated hypotheses remain visibly distinct from reported findings. Decision support is evaluated by whether uncertainty changes action—requesting evidence, withholding a recommendation, escalating to an expert, or authorizing a bounded use—rather than by extraction accuracy alone. The synthesis also addresses causal overreach, feedback from prior decisions, and governance of updates or deletions. It introduces no new manufacturing dataset. Its contribution is a lifecycle knowledge framework in which AI can connect heterogeneous evidence while provenance, calibrated uncertainty, and named decision authority preserve accountability.

PDF

References

Debe, M. K. (2012). Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature, 486, 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11115

Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (Eds.). (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Ashgate.

Jaouen, F., Proietti, E., Lefevre, M., Chenitz, R., Dodelet, J.-P., Wu, G., Chung, H. T., Johnston, C. M., & Zelenay, P. (2011). Recent advances in non-precious metal catalysis for oxygen-reduction reaction in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Energy & Environmental Science, 4, 114-130. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00011F

Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

Linkov, I., & Trump, B. D. (2019). The science and practice of resilience. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04565-4

Norskov, J. K., Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A., Lindqvist, L., Kitchin, J. R., Bligaard, T., & Jonsson, H. (2004). Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 108(46), 17886-17892. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp047349j

Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press.

Tao, J., Lyu, R., & Cao, X. (2026). A scalable data governance architecture for privacy-aware intelligent learning systems in lifelong. Future-Adaptive Intelligence and Lifelong Systems, 1(1).

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.