Keywords
artifact-aware smoothing
motion artifact
paired simulation
reproducibility
Abstract
We evaluated artifact-aware smoothing for wearable biosignal monitoring under 29% motion artifact. A deterministic paired simulation generated 64 cases and preserved a late-arriving block. Mean event sensitivity changed from 0.475 to 0.517; the paired difference was +0.042 (95% interval +0.040 to +0.044). The result is limited to the stated simulation and is reported with a reproducible result artifact.
References
Ding, S., Yu, X., Wang, Q., Luo, P., Li, H., Li, Z., Wang, R., Liu, H., He, Y., Nong, J., & Zhang, C. (2025). Multifunctional hydrogel sensors with dynamic covalent networks for machine learning-assisted Parkinson's disease diagnosis and encrypted human-computer interaction. Materials Today Bio, 35, 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102524
Wang, J., Chen, L., Chen, F., Lu, X., Li, X., Bao, Y., Wang, W., Han, D., & Niu, L. (2024). Coral-like Ti3C2Tx/PANI Binary Nanocomposite Wearable Enzyme Electrochemical Biosensor for Continuous Monitoring of Human Sweat Glucose. Chemosensors, 12(11), 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12110222
Lee, M., & Seo, S. (2021). Wearable Wireless Biosensor Technology for Monitoring Cattle: A Review. Animals, 11(10), 2779. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102779
Mateescu, A., Wang, Y., Dostalek, J., & Jonas, U. (2012). Thin Hydrogel Films for Optical Biosensor Applications. Membranes, 2(1), 40-69. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes2010040
Daskalaki, E., Parkinson, A., Brew-Sam, N., Hossain, M. Z., O'Neal, D., Nolan, C. J., & Suominen, H. (2022). The Potential of Current Noninvasive Wearable Technology for the Monitoring of Physiological Signals in the Management of Type 1 Diabetes: Literature Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(4), e28901. https://doi.org/10.2196/28901
Khor, S. M., Choi, J., Won, P., & Ko, S. H. (2022). Challenges and Strategies in Developing an Enzymatic Wearable Sweat Glucose Biosensor as a Practical Point-Of-Care Monitoring Tool for Type II Diabetes. Nanomaterials, 12(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12020221
Naseska, M., Globočnik, A., Davies, S., Yetisen, A. K., & Humar, M. (2024). Non-contact monitoring of glucose concentration and pH by integration of wearable and implantable hydrogel sensors with optical coherence tomography. Optics Express, 32(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.506780
Sadeghzadeh, S., Li, P., Zheng, H., Ausri, I. R., GhavamiNejad, P., Caron-Godon, C., Devries, M. C., Graham, M., Quadrilatero, J., & Poudineh, M. (2026). Functional Wearable Hydrogel Microneedle Platform for Continuous Ketone Monitoring: Translating from Rodents to Humans. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6103036
Das, J., & Sarkar, P. (2016). Enzymatic electrochemical biosensor for urea with a polyaniline grafted conducting hydrogel composite modified electrode. RSC Advances, 6(95), 92520-92533. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra12159d
DiMartini, A., Behari, J., Dunn, M., Bataller, R. A., Jakicic, J. M., McNulty, M., Young, R. C., & Dew, M. A. (2023). Challenges and Solutions for Monitoring Alcohol Use in Patients With Alcohol-Related Liver Disease: Pilot Study of a Wearable Alcohol Biosensor. Psychosomatic Medicine, 85(7), 596-604. https://doi.org/10.1097/psy.0000000000001203