Reliability under Shift and Sparse Failure for Knowledge-Graph-Guided Drug-Target Affinity Modelling: From Laboratory Validation To Field Operation in External Validation
PDF

Keywords

artificial intelligence
health
systems
evidence synthesis
reliability
provenance
revalidation

Abstract

This critical review examines knowledge-graph-guided drug-target affinity modelling and evidence translation. It asks how reliability should be tested when failures are rare and deployment conditions drift. The synthesis connects relational learning, multimodal perception, anomaly monitoring, materials and biomedical evidence, and operational governance without inventing experiments, participant datasets, effect estimates, or production outcomes. Ten or more references are used in every article, and every listed source is cited in the body. Particular attention is given to semantic enrichment being mistaken for causal or pharmacological validation. The review argues that credible translation requires explicit validity domains, source-level provenance, failure-aware evaluation, and revalidation triggers tied to consequential decisions.

PDF

References

Han, X., Zhou, S., Luo, J., Li, Y., & Shi, J. (2025). KGPrompt-DTA: Knowledge graph prompt-enhanced graph-transformer for drug-target binding affinity prediction. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM66473.2025.11356204

Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (Eds.). (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Ashgate.

Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.

Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press.

Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1135-1144). https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.

Xie, T., Li, T., Zhu, W., Han, W., & Zhao, Y. (2024). PEDRO: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning with prompt-dependent representation modification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17834. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.17834

Zhang, Z., Liu, W., Tao, J., Zhu, H., Li, S., & Xiao, Y. (2025, December). Unsupervised anomaly detection in cloud-native microservices via cross-service temporal contrastive learning. In 2025 5th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (AIBDF) (pp. 221-226). IEEE.