Abstract
Benchmark datasets play a critical role in advancing food contamination analytics because they provide common evaluation conditions for comparing detection models, spectral preprocessing pipelines, and unmixing algorithms. Meat contamination detection is particularly challenging when contaminant signals are weak, spatially limited, or spectrally similar to natural biological variation. Hyperspectral unmixing benchmarks enable researchers to evaluate whether models can separate weak contamination signatures from mixed tissue spectra. This topic focuses on the design and use of benchmark-driven spectral analytics for food safety inspection. Key issues include endmember selection, abundance estimation, spectral variability, labeling uncertainty, and reproducibility across acquisition settings. By emphasizing weak-signal detection, this literature direction supports food inspection systems that move beyond simple classification toward interpretable spectral decomposition and measurable contamination evidence.
References
Long, Z., Zia, A., Nelis, J., Rolland, V., & Zhou, J. (2024). A New Hyperspectral Unmixing Benchmark for Weak Signal Meat Contamination Detection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (pp. 569–576). https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA63115.2024.00088
Bioucas-Dias, J. M., Plaza, A., Dobigeon, N., et al. (2012). Hyperspectral unmixing overview: Geometrical, statistical, and sparse regression-based approaches. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 5(2), 354–379.
Heinz, D. C., & Chang, C. I. (2001). Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(3), 529–545.
Winter, M. E. (1999). N-FINDR: An algorithm for fast autonomous spectral end-member determination in hyperspectral data. Imaging Spectrometry V, 3753, 266–275.
Boardman, J. W. (1993). Automating spectral unmixing of AVIRIS data using convex geometry concepts. JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop.
Gowen, A. A., O’Donnell, C. P., Cullen, P. J., Downey, G., & Frias, J. M. (2007). Hyperspectral imaging for food quality and safety control. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 18(12), 590–598.
Qin, J., Chao, K., Kim, M. S., Lu, R., & Burks, T. F. (2013). Hyperspectral and multispectral imaging for food safety and quality. Journal of Food Engineering, 118(2), 157–171.
Burger, J., & Gowen, A. (2011). Data handling in hyperspectral image analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 108(1), 13–22.
Wu, D., & Sun, D. W. (2013). Advanced applications of hyperspectral imaging for food quality and safety. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 19, 15–28.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer.
